Grrrreat GIFT IDEAS!
PetPix STAR of 2008!
REBEL from Scotland PetPix PORTAL
Pawsitive FEEDBACK!
Gift CERTIFICATES?
|
The Amazon Store at MillionDollarPetPix.com ( In association with Amazon.com )The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion List Price: $14.95 Amazon.com's Price: $10.17 You Save: $4.78 (32%)Prices subject to change. Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping.
Binding: HardcoverDewey Decimal Number: 172 EAN: 9781586171667 ISBN: 1586171666 Label: Ignatius Press Manufacturer: Ignatius Press Number Of Items: 1 Number Of Pages: 85 Publication Date: January 10, 2007 Publisher: Ignatius Press Studio: Ignatius Press Related Items:
Editorial Review: Product Description: Two of the worlds great contemporary thinkers--theologian and churchman Joseph Ratzinger, now Pope Benedict XVI, and Jurgen Habermas, philosopher and Neo-Marxist social critic--discuss and debate aspects of secularization, and the role of reason and religion in a free society. These insightful essays are the result of a remarkable dialogue between the two men, sponsored by the Catholic Academy of Bavaria, a little over a year before Joseph Ratzinger was elected pope. Jurgen Habermas has surprised many observers with his call for "the secular society to acquire a new understanding of religious convictions", as Florian Schuller, director of the Catholic Academy of Bavaria, describes it his foreword. Habermas discusses whether secular reason provides sufficient grounds for a democratic constitutional state. Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI argues for the necessity of certain moral principles for maintaining a free state, and for the importance of genuine reason and authentic religion, rather than what he calls "pathologies of reason and religion", in order to uphold the states moral foundations. Both men insist that proponents of secular reason and religious conviction should learn from each other, even as they differ over the particular ways that mutual learning should occur. Average Rating:
 Rating:  - good but not enoughThe Dialectics of Secularization is a well written pamphlet that gives you the basic thought behind the tension that exists between revelation(religion) and reason(secularization).It argues for an interplay between the two as the best way to enjoy the benefits of both. If you are unfamiliar with the subject, it's a start! Rating:  - Excellent Considerations from Two Very Different Starting PointsVery rarely do I believe that a human dialogue approaches its subject from two very different poles. However, in the case of Habermas and Ratzinger's dialogue, one could say that the subject of their talk (on secularization's dialectic with religion) is really the form of their interaction. These two authors come from two very different starting points with regard to the state, although no dialectic is undertaken without a uniting point, even if it is the midpoint between two very extreme poles. ... Read More Rating: - Rational faithReading this book requires a concentrated level of attentive reading. It is a great argument for a rational approach to the adoption of any belief system. Faith without reason is blind and capricious. Rating:  - Heavy Philosophy & A Call to ConscienceUndoubtedly, these authors are the gold standard in their respective arena. The first is a Kant-based neo Marxist and the latter a theologian steeped in Augustine and leader of the Catholic world. If you are in search of a page-turner with a climatic ending, keep looking. Otherwise, this is a smartly presented text divided into a chapter for each speaker who makes their case with calculated passion. The reader without a basic foundation for philosophy may find this one a bit over the top. ... Read More Rating: - Debating the place of Religion in SocietyHabermas and Ratzinger (now Benedict XVI) are two of the greatest minds of their times. This short work is their take on the interctions of democratic culture, political liberalism, religion and God. These two separate essays are the summation of a discussion between these two men. They were written well after the conversation had taken place and so ovbiously they're a little less satisfying than if we were able to read a transcript of the conversation, or perhaps response papers written immediately thereafter. ... Read More 
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
